The Left is portraying Cindy Sheehan as simply a grieving mother who's taking action because of the loss of her son. But what about this Cindy Sheehan:
“Our family was against it from the beginning. Casey was against it, but he felt it was his duty to go because he was in the Army. And he felt that he had to go to protect his buddies, to be there for his buddies, to be support, and they are brainwashed into thinking that even if they don’t agree with the mission, they’re brainwashed into just blindly following it. I begged Casey not to go. I told him I would take him to Canada. I told him I would run over him with a car, anything to get him not to go to that immoral war. And he said, 'Mom, I wish I didn’t have to, but I have to go.' ''
I know as a parent, there would never be an instance on this planet where I would tell my child that I would run them over with a car... FOR ANY REASON.
Kinda kills her whole "poor, little grieving mother" image if you think about it.
And if you look at the timeline, she was telling her son, before he deployed, that she was hellbent against the war. She called the war "immoral" long before Bush met with her the first time. This isn't a case of her learning new facts after their first meeting, this is a case of leftwing lunacy now exploiting her son's honorable memory to advance an agenda she had long before he died.
It's just damn sad.
Cross-posted from Generation Why?
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.gopbloggers.org/mt/majority.cgi/1864
Sad? It's damn pathetic. Her foul language of late, is not a tribute her son's life deserves. She and Michael Moore are only out to make Bush look bad, and to play the blame game. It is unfortunate that her name is mentioned so many times in the news.
I salute her son! To her, she does not deserve another visit from the President. There are too many deserving injured troops and appreciative famlies who are more deserving of his attention. She, by using the foul language and false accusations is only using her son's death to get her liberal lies out.
I don't even feel sorry for this woman. Any one who can take up with Michael Moore does not know how to grieve properly.
Posted by: Michele Kelly at August 18, 2005 06:31 PM
I posted on this very subject a few days ago.
RWR
Posted by: RightWingRocker
at August 19, 2005 12:32 AM
We have launched a new website to show how many people support our President, Troops, and country.
The website is called :
www.stopcindysheehan.org
There is a visitor counter on the top of the page so that you can see how many people have
visited the website.
Tell everyone you know to check this out, so that we can show America who the majority is!
Sincerely,
webmaster @ www.stopcindysheehan.org
www.stopcindysheehan.org
Posted by: US-Support at August 20, 2005 07:04 PM
Cindy Sheehan is dishonoring her son Casey in several ways. One way she dishonors him is by omitting what his own views on the Iraq war was and synthesizing her own personal views with his. I find it strange that she says her son was against the war in Iraq, but yet Casey Sheehen reenlisted in the army of his own volition, that just doesn’t comport with Cindy Sheehan’s statements. This is a 100 % volunteer military, there is no conscription and that begs the question as to why Casey Sheehan reenlisted in a war he opposed, if that is even true. If perhaps Casey Sheehan disagreed with certain aspects of the war in Iraq e.g..he felt maybe we needed more troops in Iraq, or more armor on humvee’s or better food for the troops etc., then that should be explained by Cindy Sheehan without the partisan hyperbole. A person can complain about particular conditions in Iraq without opposing the entire war in Iraq you know. During another interview on national television Cindy Sheehan stated that her son was killed by friendly fire, when she was pressed about that statement she then said ” well I have speculative evidence that he was killed by friendly fire.” It’s amazing that anyone could use the words speculative and evidence in the same sentence side by side and keep a straight face. Evidence substantiates an allegation, speculation is just the opposite it requires no evidence at all,to use “speculative evidence” together is a perfect example of an oxymoron. The real truth of Casey Sheehan’s death is he was killed by hostile fire in Sadr City, this was the consistent report of his death since day one, medical reports and the reports from fellow soldiers who were present at his death confirm the same fact. Casey Sheehan was a real hero of the first order, when a convoy of soldiers from his unit was attacked in Sadr City he volunteered to join a rescue force to get them out, even after his commanding Sergeant told him he didn’t have to go because he was a mechanic and not an infantryman. Casey was reported telling his officer ” I go where my chief goes.” Thats not a man who didn’t believe in his cause or his duty, thats a hero. Casey Sheehan’s family has released this statement and I quote ” We do not agree with the political motivations and publicity tactics of Cindy Sheehan. She now appears to be promoting her own personal agenda and notoriety at the the expense of her son’s good name and reputation.”
Posted by: William Leatherwood at August 22, 2005 11:10 PM




