Lincoln Chafee is not the sharpest knife in the Senate, which is why he joined Democrats in killing legislation that would have reduced the price of gasoline. As with any issue of prices, the laws of supply and demand rule regardless of what politicians might think. With no new refinery built in America since 1976, it is no wonder gas prices are increasing. It doesn't matter if the price of oil drops, since you have to refine it before you can put it in your car.
The problem is that Congress, through a maze of regulations, has made it unlikely any company would pursue new construction of a refinery. So, as demand grows, supply remains constant and prices rise to clear the market. But Democrats don't know how markets work, and Chafee doesn't either.
"We should be addressing our consumption, not just demand," Sen. Chafee said [quote in a Dow Jones Newswire story with no web link and in the Wall Street Journal (subscription required)]Address consumption, but not demand?Apparently, the problem is not just America's supply of gasoline, but Chafee's supply of grey matter. Will someone on the dunce Senator's staff please inform him that consumption is demand!? Meanwhile, Chafee and the Democrats ignore the actual problem.
Proponents note that refinery capacity in the United States has dropped by some 50 percent in the past two decades – and that refineries are currently operating at close to 100 percent. The last new refinery was built in the United States in 1976.So the combination of these 18 boutique fuels and the damaging ethanol requirement (midwestern corn farmers are some of America's most egregious parasites with their ethanol subsidies) are a major issue. Also, the Byzantine permitting process is so bad that barely anyone is willing to risk the capital to build a new refinery. It took one company in Arizona 5 years to get an air-quality permit and they hope to be operational 15 years after beginning the process.Refiners now must supply 18 different formulations of gasoline, but can produce only one formulation at a time. Some of the specialty fuels are summer formulations that produce lower emissions to meet Clean Air Act standards in cities with high levels of air pollution.
Laws that took effect in 2004 forced refiners to switch some formulations. California, New York and Connecticut no longer sell fuel with the water polluting oxygenate MTBE, instead changing to fuels with ethanol, a fuel derived from grain. Refiners must make new reformulated gasoline to blend with the ethanol.
If Chafee and the Democrats refuse to allow an expansion of refining capacity, then either prices will continue to rise or we will have to ration gasoline. They should tell Americans today which of those two alternatives they advocate.
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.gopbloggers.org/mt/majority.cgi/2394
And the Dems alternative....
http://epw.senate.gov/pressitem.cfm?party=rep&id=247745
WASHINGTON, DC - Sen. James Inhofe (R-Okla.), Chairman of the Environment & Public Works (EPW) Committee, today dismissed an attempt by Democrat members of the Committee to socialize petroleum refining in the United States, voting with nine other Committee members to reject a substitute amendment offered by Ranking Member Jeffords that would have placed the Environmental Protection Agency in charge of designing, building and operating refineries at taxpayer expense.
“What the minority proposed today as a ‘solution’ to expanding refinery capacity amounts to socializing gas production in this country, essentially a Clinton Health Care prescription to control gas prices with the EPA in charge,” Senator Inhofe said. “I have said all along that opponents to sensible legislation that will expand refinery capacity and help lower gas prices only seek to politicize the issue for points leading into the next election cycle. We offered a solution to help alleviate the pain in the pocket book for all Americans, and the best solution our colleagues on the other side could offer in return was changing the name of the EPA to the ‘Environmental Petroleum Agency’ and anointing Administrator Johnson the next ‘Big Oil’ magnate. The last thing the American consumer needs is socialized gas production.”
The Committee rejected the Jeffords substitute amendment on a straight majority/minority line vote of 10-8.
Posted by: Republican at October 28, 2005 04:47 PM




