March 17, 2006
ABC News Investigates Iraq Documents

ABC News is probably the most serious of the three major networks. They've begun analyzing recently released documents captured in Iraq, and there are some interesting findings.

An Iraqi intelligence service document saying that their Afghani informant, who's only identified by a number, told them that the Afghani Consul Ahmed Dahastani claimed the following in front of him:

That OBL and the Taliban are in contact with Iraq and that a group of Taliban and bin Laden group members visited Iraq.
That the U.S. has proof the Iraqi government and "bin Laden's group" agreed to cooperate to attack targets inside America.

That in case the Taliban and bin Laden's group turn out to be involved in "these destructive operations," the U.S. may strike Iraq and Afghanistan.
That the Afghani consul heard about the issue of Iraq's relationship with "bin Laden's group" while he was in Iran.

Any proof of collaboration between Iraq and al Qaeda would blow apart all conventional wisdom. Correctly, the ABC Editor's Note states that "the sourcing is questionable" and that "without further corroboration, this document is of limited evidentiary value." Perhaps CBS (if they even acknowledge existence of these documents) will conclude that it should be taken at face value since it has not been proven to be a forgery.
Correspondence regarding election campaigns in France. This includes a document from the Iraqi intelligence service classified as "secret," ordering the translation of important parts of a 1997 report about campaign financing laws in France. It also includes a document from the foreign minister's office indicating the report was attached. The attached translated report included very detailed information about all the regulations regarding financing of election campaigns in France.
Can you say "Oil-for-Food bribery?"
A letter from the Iraqi intelligence service to directors and managers advising them to follow certain procedures in case of a search by the U.N. team, including:

Removing correspondence with the atomic energy and military industry departments concerning the prohibited weapons (proposals, research, studies, catalogs, etc.).
Removing prohibited materials and equipment, including documents and catalogs and making sure to clear labs and storages of any traces of chemical or biological materials that were previously used or stored
.

Again, the only liar on WMD was Saddam.
A number of correspondences to check rumors that some members of al Qaeda organization have entered Iraq. Three letters say this information cannot be confirmed. The letter on page seven, however, says that information coming from "a trustworthy source" indicates that subjects who are interested in dealing with al Qaeda are in Iraq and have several passports.
This does not prove a collaborative relationship, but it would seem to disprove the myth that al Qaeda was not present in Iraq until the war.

The documents released are a drop in the ocean of what's been captured. But it is good to see that at least one MSM outlet is spending time on the story. Let's see if the NY Times or others follow suit on what should be a major investigative opportunity. They expended lots of resources on the "story" of Augusta National's men-only policy. This story is slightly more significant.

Posted by Jonathan R. on March 17, 2006 12:20 PM
Trackback Pings

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.gopbloggers.org/mt/majority.cgi/3341



Comments

Both NYT and WaPo have run stories and without the disclaimers ABC ran.

US releases confiscated prewar Iraqi documents
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The Bush administration on Thursday released prewar Iraqi government documents confiscated by U.S. forces, including some it said showed Saddam Hussein's regime suspected an al Qaeda presence in the country.

If Saddam Hussein's regime only SUSPECTED al Qaeda was present - Saddam the documents strongly suggest that Saddam felt that Al queda's presense was a security concern and that he had no collaborative relationship with them, why would he want romurs of someone's prsense on Iraqi territory investigated if he had a collaborative relationship with him.

Posted by: Watson at March 17, 2006 01:20 PM


If you're not saying that Iraq had something to do with 9/11, then what is the point of spending time on this?

Posted by: Dave Johnson [TypeKey Profile Page] at March 17, 2006 01:53 PM


Nobody ever claimed that Iraq was involved in 9/11 and it is not even named among the many reasons listed in the Congressional authorization for the war

Posted by: Jonathan R. at March 17, 2006 02:21 PM


http://www.aim.org/aim_report/4425_0_4_0_C/

1998 and 1999 Media reports connect Saddam to 911, and these docs are increasingly demonstrating the 911 Commission's claim that Saddam wanted to work closer with UBL & UBL wanted to work closer with Saddam

Posted by: Scott Malensek at April 5, 2006 07:48 AM



Post a comment




Remember Me?



(NOTE: You must get this correct, otherwise, your comment will be rejected.)

(you may use HTML tags for style)