July 28, 2006
Liberal Democrat for BoltonDemocrats who actually think for themselves are realizing that John Bolton is an able and worthy U.S. ambassador to that den of iniquity called the U.N. Alan Dershowitz is one.
As a liberal Democrat, I listened carefully to the opposition voiced by many Democratic senators to the nomination of John Bolton as our chief representative to the United Nations. Mr. Bolton has been representing us at the United Nations since August. During the current Middle East crisis, I have been able to listen for myself to what Mr. Bolton has been saying at the United Nations.New York Senators Schumer and Clinton are under pressure not to filibuster Bolton, and he just might get the vote he deserves.On the basis of his performance, I have become a Bolton supporter. He speaks with moral clarity. He is extremely well prepared. He is extraordinarily articulate. He places the best face on American policy, particularly in the Middle East during this crucial time...
at this point in history, the United States needs a public advocate who can further its case in the court of public opinion. No one does that better than John Bolton.
Posted by Jonathan R. on July 28, 2006 12:22 PM
Trackback Pings
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.gopbloggers.org/mt/majority.cgi/3963
Comments
Not being Jewish,I can't for the life of me understand the connection between them and the Dems.The Dems are opposed to every thing they are for,especialy as regards Isreal.
Posted by: jainphx at July 28, 2006 05:07 PM
The Democrats opposition to Bolton best bespeaks the fundamental premise of their political philosophy-process matters more than substance.
We see it everywhere, but few place more clearly than the Ds love of the U.N. Although there is no evidence that the U.N. has any effective function with respect to "collective security" and is utterly corrupt, the Dems would rather not discuss such unpleasant truths.
Bolton-you wer too kind to the Dem Senators. Get tough next time.
Posted by: The Real Sporer at July 29, 2006 12:19 AM
Post a comment
