How much more empirical evidence is needed before liberals stop their religious devotion to the idea that tax cuts cause deficits and look at the statistical facts? Just as JFK and Ronald Reagan proved, cuts in marginal tax rates lead to such an accelerated pace of economic growth that the net effect is a booming increase in tax revenue. The Wall Street Journal points out what the MSM does not want you to know:

Congress keeps breaking the Beltway Book of World Records for spending money, but the government will soon report that the federal budget deficit for the just-completed 2006 fiscal year fell to about $260 billion...

The main cause of the deficit decline -- 90% of it, says White House budget director Rob Portman -- is a tidal wave of tax revenue. Tax collections have increased by $521 billion in the last two fiscal years, the largest two-year revenue increase -- even after adjusting for inflation -- in American history...

One place it has come from are corporations, whose tax collections have climbed by 76% over the past two years thanks to greater profitability. Personal income tax payments are up by 30.3% since 2004 too, despite the fact that the highest tax rate is down to 35% from 39.6%. The IRS tax-return data just released last month indicates that a near-record 37% of those income tax payments are received from the top 1% of earners -- "the rich," who are derided regularly in Washington for not paying their "fair share."

More good news is that dividend-tax payments appear to be up as well, even though the tax rate was lowered to 15% from as high as 39.6%. A National Bureau of Economic Research study found that "after a continuous decline in dividend payments over more than two decades, total regular dividends have grown by nearly 20%" and that this reversal happened at "precisely the point at which the lower tax rate was proposed and subsequently applied retroactively." There hasn't been a purer validation of the Laffer Curve since Ronald Reagan rode off into the sunset.

As for the budget deficit, at $260 billion it is now about 2% of our $13 trillion economy, well below the 2.7% average of the last 40 years. Most states and localities are also afloat in tax collections, and including their revenue surpluses brings the total U.S. public sector borrowing down to roughly 1.5% of GDP. Not too shabby given that we're waging a war on terrorism and Congress spent $50 billion last year on Hurricane Katrina clean-up.

The current budget deficit is clearly caused by excessive spending, not by insufficient taxation. Among the myriad failures of the Republican Congress is not only the inability to make permanent the indisputably bountiful Bush tax cuts, but, perhaps even moreso, to make Americans aware of the unqualified success they have been. As for Democrats, their bizarre refusal to acknowledge these clear facts, for fear doing so would force them to reconsider one of the core tenets of their faith, resembles the blind devotion to religion rather than science that liberals charge conservatives with on issues ranging from stem cell research to
"global warming."

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.gopbloggers.org/mt/majority.cgi/4264

---

Name:

Email Address:

URL:
Remember Me? YesNo

What is the Vice-President's last name?

(NOTE: You must get this correct, otherwise, your comment will be rejected.)

Comments: (you may use HTML tags for style)