November 09, 2006
To Win in 2008, Go Back to 1994

Dick Armey echoes Tom Coburn's sentiments.

If there was still any doubt, the Republican Revolution of 1994 officially ended Tuesday night...

It was a rout...

It is often said that Newt Gingrich and I "nationalized" the election in 1994, but what the Contract with America really did was establish a national (as opposed to a parochial) vision for the Republican Party. When we took control, that positive Reagan vision of limited government and individual responsibility provided a great deal of discipline and allowed us to govern accordingly. Our primary question in those early years was: How do we reform government and return money and power back to the American people?

Eventually, the policy innovators and the "Spirit of '94" were largely replaced by political bureaucrats driven by a narrow vision. Their question became: How do we hold onto political power? The aberrant behavior and scandals that ended up defining the Republican majority in 2006 were a direct consequence of this shift in choice criteria from policy to political power...

For most Republican candidates, fiscal responsibility is our political bread and butter. No matter how voters view other, more divisive issues from abortion to stem-cell research, Republicans have traditionally enjoyed a clear advantage with a majority of Americans on basic pocketbook issues. "We will spend your money carefully and we will keep your taxes low." That was our commitment. This year, no incumbent Republican (even those who fought for restraint) could credibly make that claim...

I've always wondered why Republicans insist on acting like Democrats in hopes of retaining political power, while Democrats act like us in order to win...

In 2006, instead of heavy lifting on substantial reforms, House and Senate leaders attempted to rally their political base on wedge issues like illegal immigration and gay marriage. Instead of dealing with spending bills or retirement security, the Senate dedicated two full legislative days to a constitutional ban on gay marriage that no one expected to pass. No substantive legislation was passed dealing seriously with border security and legitimate guest workers (funding for a 700 mile fence was finally authorized, but no funds were appropriated). In both instances, it was pure politics, designed to appeal to angry factions of the GOP base. While Republicans managed to hold conservative Christians, they alienated independents, who represent 26% of the voting population. For the first time in 10 years, independents sided with Democrats by a wide margin. Candidates that bet on the high demagogy coefficient associated with illegal immigration, notably in Arizona, lost...

We need to remember Ronald Reagan's legacy and again stand for positive, big ideas that get power and money out of politics and government bureaucracy and back into the hands of individuals. We also need again to demonstrate an ability to be good stewards of the taxpayers' hard-earned money.

Posted by Jonathan R. on November 9, 2006 08:55 AM
Trackback Pings

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.gopbloggers.org/mt/majority.cgi/4438



Comments

And of course, it has nothing to do with DeLay accepting cash donations in exchange for policy. DeLay is so deep in denial, it's like a psychological case study.

Posted by: David J at November 9, 2006 06:55 PM


All 27 Democrats who took Republican seats back raising the minimum wage, advocate changing course in Iraq, and oppose efforts to privatize Social Security. In fact, the significant shift on Tuesday was the collapse of the "Reagan Coalition" voting bloc that had been nurtured by the conservative movement for 20 years. Majorities of every income category under $100,000; six in 10 of both moderates and independents; all non-college educated voters; and the majority of Catholics—all voted for change. In other words, the so-called Reagan Democrats—economic-minded, working class voters concentrated heavily in the Rust Belt—returned home to the progressive movement.

Posted by: Sean at November 9, 2006 08:18 PM



Post a comment




Remember Me?



(NOTE: You must get this correct, otherwise, your comment will be rejected.)

(you may use HTML tags for style)