Lots of people want to know more about Fred Thompson these days. The good news is that the Weekly Standard's Stephen Hayes has some great news about Thompson's conservatism:
David McIntosh, a former congressman from Indiana, and Lawrence Lindsey, President Bush's top economic adviser in his first term, came expecting to discuss tax reform, or social issues, or perhaps the long-term stability of Medicare. They would get to that, eventually.
I remember David McIntosh from his time in the House, though I couldn't cite any accomplishments McIntosh had. Thankfully, Stephen Hayes provides us some great insight into who Rep. McIntosh is:
McIntosh, who in 1982 helped start the Federalist Society, the well-known national organization for conservative lawyers and students, is widely regarded as a serious conservative thinker and someone who is in touch with the ideas that animate movement conservatives. McIntosh says Thompson is a conservative's conservative. "When I first talked to Fred, I thought either he's a better actor than anyone I've ever met, or this is really him. Having spent more time, I know he's a real conservative."
The significance of this information can't be underestimated. Conservatives stayed home in 2006 because the were disenchanted with the leftward drift of President Bush and others on immigration and spending. It's time for conservatives to realize that we've got a true conservative in the race now. Fred Thompson got his start in conservatism when he read Barry Goldwater's book "The Conscience of a Conservative".
It's time to get excited about keeping the White House in GOP hands. It's time we start focusing on putting an appealing conservative in there. I can't think of a better man for the job than Fred Thompson. Follow this link if you need more proof.
You're assuming Conservatives are really for limited spending.
Posted by: Nirvision
at June 11, 2007 03:42 PM
I am not sure what you have been reading or why you think that people voted Democratic in the last election, but it was not because the "leftward drift of President Bush." Whether you want to believe the polls, people were fed up with Republicans because of the war in Iraq, corruption, and felt that the country was on the wrong track.
Posted by: Brian at June 11, 2007 07:51 PM
Gary and any others who are looking to Fred Thompson to come into this race and razzle dazzle us all: Ain't going to happen. If Fred Thompson gets the nomination, I am voting third party.
Fred Thompson is another Bush-esque candidate, whos election could further hurt our domestic and foreign relations. Internally, we need a president who is NOT the anti-Hilalry, rather uniter that is appealing to all Americans based on openness and integrity (not a cowboy). Externally, we need someone who can tone down the rhetoric of the ever less popular Bush administration.
Admittedly, I proudly supported Bush through two elections, and right up until this immigration snafu and peculiar directives. But what this country needs is not another "more of the same" candidate.
Sorry...
Posted by: Steven M Nielson at June 11, 2007 11:25 PM
History is a valuable tool from which to learn and history has taught anyone open to its lessons that liberals have never been wrong and conservatives have never been right. From the Spanish Inquisition, the persecution of scientists, the crusades, racism, and general intolerance, it is universally accepted that conservatism failed humanity. We are all liberal in hindsight once we are emotionally detached from a situation.
It is possible for conservatism to embody many diverse views because conservatism is not, an ideology like many believe, it is a method of thought. Society and culture are the variables that allow many views to be derived from a constant philosophy.
The only diffrence between a supporter of terrorism, a member of the KKK, and a conservative in America today is the society they were born into.
Conservatism is the politics of delay. It seek to preserve the society in which it exists and will arbitrarily oppose anything counter to this irrespective of its merit. So long as society is imperfect conservatism will be wrong.
Although the specific ideology of each conservative movement is dependent on society every society, and therefore every conservative movement has some common traits. These include: the containment of new ideas of new ideas and foreign cultures, a fear of change, a rejection of outsiders, and a desire to preserve society in its present form.
How could such an illogical philosophy flourish? There are three basic and interconnected roots of conservatism: ignorance, fear, and hate. Ignorance is the deepest root of conservatism. Within the context of politics ignorance is ultimately the sole cause of two other roots. This may be an alarming statement for some of my conservative friends, but it is easily demonstrated when looking to examples of conservative philosophy.
Racism has been the most widespread and controversial conservative belief. Racism is fear of a benign change in culture, an ignorance of others, and a hate of a people perceived as inferior. Characteristically we think of the south (a traditional hot bed for conservatism), slavery, and segregation. However racism manifests itself in our culture even today.
For example, the immigration debate. The simple facts of this issue are that having a large number of immigrant laborers in our country is a mutually beneficial economic relationship. Conservatives, however, fear their culture may be diluted, hate a people who they perceive as criminals, and are ignorant of the facts of this issue. It has been noted, and successfully demonstrated, that any Minutemen project volunteer allowed to see firsthand the life of an immigrant family would quickly renounce their previous opinions on the topic.
Gay rights is another issue where conservatism's motivations shine through. Conservatives passionately oppose granting any rights extended to heterosexual individuals despite the fact that this would cause them no harm. Conservatives hate gays for their "sin", an issue that is frankly beyond their control (doesn't the Bible instruct that "he who is without sin may throw the first stone"), fear something they cannot understand, and are ignorant of the facts that most gays have more in common with them then they'd be willing to admit.
I will not go into any more examples although any conservative belief, ancient or modern, can be traced back to these three factors.
Posted by: Anonymous at June 13, 2007 08:33 PM





